On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:38:36PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896685 points out
a regression caused by commit 38c4a9c - libvirt only labels
the backing chain if the backing chain cache is populated, but
the code to populate the cache was only
On 02/21/2013 03:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:38:36PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896685 points out
a regression caused by commit 38c4a9c - libvirt only labels
the backing chain if the backing chain cache is populated, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896685 points out
a regression caused by commit 38c4a9c - libvirt only labels
the backing chain if the backing chain cache is populated, but
the code to populate the cache was only conditionally performed
if cgroup labeling was necessary.
*