Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] qemu: check backing chains even when cgroup is omitted

2013-02-21 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:38:36PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896685 points out a regression caused by commit 38c4a9c - libvirt only labels the backing chain if the backing chain cache is populated, but the code to populate the cache was only

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] qemu: check backing chains even when cgroup is omitted

2013-02-21 Thread Eric Blake
On 02/21/2013 03:44 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:38:36PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896685 points out a regression caused by commit 38c4a9c - libvirt only labels the backing chain if the backing chain cache is populated, but

[libvirt] [PATCH] qemu: check backing chains even when cgroup is omitted

2013-02-20 Thread Eric Blake
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896685 points out a regression caused by commit 38c4a9c - libvirt only labels the backing chain if the backing chain cache is populated, but the code to populate the cache was only conditionally performed if cgroup labeling was necessary. *