On 04/20/2016 03:29 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:03:08 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> It's not a matter of 'insist'ing or not; when in this area of the code I saw
>> the min_guarantee check, which seemed out of place, since there are already
>> several such checks in the pos
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:03:08 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> It's not a matter of 'insist'ing or not; when in this area of the code I saw
> the min_guarantee check, which seemed out of place, since there are already
> several such checks in the postparse handler.There's no comment explaining why
On 04/19/2016 04:39 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 19:13:08 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
>> Explain why we check it at process startup time, and not parse time
>> where most other XML validation checks are performed
>
> This is far from being a singular case ...
>
>> ---
>> src
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 19:13:08 -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> Explain why we check it at process startup time, and not parse time
> where most other XML validation checks are performed
This is far from being a singular case ...
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 inserti
Explain why we check it at process startup time, and not parse time
where most other XML validation checks are performed
---
src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
index c087300..628b4b6 100644
--- a/src/qemu/
