On 10/27/2017 06:51 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 18:47:51 +0530, Madhu Pavan wrote:
On 10/27/2017 02:51 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
I think this is actually a bit more complicated. When reverting to a
snapshot, when reverting a snapshot we should revert both active and
inacti
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 18:47:51 +0530, Madhu Pavan wrote:
> On 10/27/2017 02:51 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > I think this is actually a bit more complicated. When reverting to a
> > snapshot, when reverting a snapshot we should revert both active and
> > inactive configuration for backward compati
On 10/27/2017 02:51 PM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 14:02:23 +0530, Kothapally Madhu Pavan wrote:
Restoring to a snapshot should not overwrite the persistent configuration
xml of a snapshot as a side effect. This patch fixes the same. Currently,
virDomainSnapshotDef only saves
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 14:02:23 +0530, Kothapally Madhu Pavan wrote:
> Restoring to a snapshot should not overwrite the persistent configuration
> xml of a snapshot as a side effect. This patch fixes the same. Currently,
> virDomainSnapshotDef only saves active domain definition of the guest.
> An
Restoring to a snapshot should not overwrite the persistent configuration
xml of a snapshot as a side effect. This patch fixes the same. Currently,
virDomainSnapshotDef only saves active domain definition of the guest.
And on restore the active domain definition is used as both active and
inactive
