Seems like a sane approach to me. Less if-statements and the code
still works just fine.
You can apply my patch and fix this afterwards? Or do you want a new
patch from me?
Wido
I'll take care of it as a followup patch which I'll push shortly...
John
--
libvir-list mailing list
On 07/14/2015 04:13 PM, Josh Durgin wrote:
On 07/14/2015 12:42 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
On 07/14/2015 04:15 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
We used to look at the librbd code version and depending on that
we would invoke rbd_create3() or rbd_create().
Since librbd version 0.67.9 we can
On 16-07-15 18:28, John Ferlan wrote:
On 07/14/2015 04:13 PM, Josh Durgin wrote:
On 07/14/2015 12:42 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
On 07/14/2015 04:15 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
We used to look at the librbd code version and depending on
that we would invoke rbd_create3() or
We used to look at the librbd code version and depending on that
we would invoke rbd_create3() or rbd_create().
Since librbd version 0.67.9 we can however tell RBD that it should
create rbd format 2 images even if we invoke rbd_create().
The less options we pass to librbd, the more we can lean
On 07/14/2015 04:15 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
We used to look at the librbd code version and depending on that
we would invoke rbd_create3() or rbd_create().
Since librbd version 0.67.9 we can however tell RBD that it should
create rbd format 2 images even if we invoke rbd_create().
On 07/14/2015 12:42 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
On 07/14/2015 04:15 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
We used to look at the librbd code version and depending on that
we would invoke rbd_create3() or rbd_create().
Since librbd version 0.67.9 we can however tell RBD that it should
create rbd format 2
