On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:42:11PM +0300, Ossi Herrala wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 07:36:48PM +, Ossi Herrala wrote:
Sorry to miss this mail, it got buried somehow and I haven't got to it
until now since nobody pinged it. Sorry for the long wait then.
No worries and thank you for taki
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 07:36:48PM +, Ossi Herrala wrote:
>
> Sorry to miss this mail, it got buried somehow and I haven't got to it
> until now since nobody pinged it. Sorry for the long wait then.
>
No worries and thank you for taking time to review my patch. See new
patch attached as w
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 07:36:48PM +, Ossi Herrala wrote:
Use I/O vector (iovec) instead of one huge memory buffer as suggested
in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026137#c7. This avoids
doing memmove() to big buffers and performance doesn't degrade if
source (virNetClientStreamQu
Use I/O vector (iovec) instead of one huge memory buffer as suggested
in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1026137#c7. This avoids
doing memmove() to big buffers and performance doesn't degrade if
source (virNetClientStreamQueuePacket()) is faster than sink
(virNetClientStreamRecvPacket()
