On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 01:04:59PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 01:12:06PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > On 7/8/19 12:39 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > Neither the sasl_client_init or sasl_server_init methods are even
> > > remotely threadsafe. They do a
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 01:12:06PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 7/8/19 12:39 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Neither the sasl_client_init or sasl_server_init methods are even
> > remotely threadsafe. They do a bunch of one-time initialization and
> > merely use a simple integer counter to
On 7/8/19 12:39 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Neither the sasl_client_init or sasl_server_init methods are even
remotely threadsafe. They do a bunch of one-time initialization and
merely use a simple integer counter to avoid repeated work, not even
using atomic increment/reads on the counter.
Neither the sasl_client_init or sasl_server_init methods are even
remotely threadsafe. They do a bunch of one-time initialization and
merely use a simple integer counter to avoid repeated work, not even
using atomic increment/reads on the counter. This can easily race in a
threaded program.
