On 08/29/2013 08:53 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 08:47:11AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Commit 29fe5d7 (released in 1.1.1) introduced a latent problem
>> for any caller of virSecurityManagerSetProcessLabel and where
>> the domain already had a uid:gid label to be parsed.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 08:47:11AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> Commit 29fe5d7 (released in 1.1.1) introduced a latent problem
> for any caller of virSecurityManagerSetProcessLabel and where
> the domain already had a uid:gid label to be parsed. Such a
> setup would collect the list of supplementary
Commit 29fe5d7 (released in 1.1.1) introduced a latent problem
for any caller of virSecurityManagerSetProcessLabel and where
the domain already had a uid:gid label to be parsed. Such a
setup would collect the list of supplementary groups during
virSecurityManagerPreFork, but then ignores that info