On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 14:18:16 +0200, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 10/18/12 14:09, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> > This should not make a big difference in real world since libvirt-daemon,
> > which is already required by libvirt-lock-sanlock, requires
> > libvirt-client and thus libvirt-lock-sanlock gets t
On 10/18/12 14:09, Jiri Denemark wrote:
This should not make a big difference in real world since libvirt-daemon,
which is already required by libvirt-lock-sanlock, requires
libvirt-client and thus libvirt-lock-sanlock gets this dependency
transitively. However, since libvirt-lock-sanlock contain
This should not make a big difference in real world since libvirt-daemon,
which is already required by libvirt-lock-sanlock, requires
libvirt-client and thus libvirt-lock-sanlock gets this dependency
transitively. However, since libvirt-lock-sanlock contains
sanlock_helper binary linked to libvirt.
