Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] storage: Skips backingStore of virtual snapshot lv

2011-11-20 Thread Osier Yang
On 2011年11月19日 02:45, Eric Blake wrote: On 11/18/2011 04:15 AM, Osier Yang wrote: lvs outputs [$lvname_vorigin] for the virtual snapshot lv (created with --virtualsize), and the original device pointed by $lvname_vorigin is just for lvm internal use, one should never use it. Per lvm's

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] storage: Skips backingStore of virtual snapshot lv

2011-11-20 Thread Osier Yang
On 2011年11月19日 02:45, Eric Blake wrote: On 11/18/2011 04:15 AM, Osier Yang wrote: lvs outputs [$lvname_vorigin] for the virtual snapshot lv (created with --virtualsize), and the original device pointed by $lvname_vorigin is just for lvm internal use, one should never use it. Per lvm's

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] storage: Skips backingStore of virtual snapshot lv

2011-11-18 Thread Osier Yang
于 2011年11月18日 19:15, Osier Yang 写道: lvs outputs [$lvname_vorigin] for the virtual snapshot lv (created with --virtualsize), and the original device pointed by $lvname_vorigin is just for lvm internal use, one should never use it. Forgot to mention the problem. If one creates a virtual snapshot

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] storage: Skips backingStore of virtual snapshot lv

2011-11-18 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/18/2011 04:15 AM, Osier Yang wrote: lvs outputs [$lvname_vorigin] for the virtual snapshot lv (created with --virtualsize), and the original device pointed by $lvname_vorigin is just for lvm internal use, one should never use it. Per lvm's nameing rules, [ is not valid as part of the