On 4/2/19 3:42 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 4/2/19 10:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 06:03:29PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Quite a few of the tests have a need to mock the stat() / lstat()
functions and they are taking somewhat different & inconsistent
On 4/2/19 10:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 06:03:29PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>> Quite a few of the tests have a need to mock the stat() / lstat()
>> functions and they are taking somewhat different & inconsistent
>> approaches none of which are actually fully
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 06:03:29PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Quite a few of the tests have a need to mock the stat() / lstat()
> functions and they are taking somewhat different & inconsistent
> approaches none of which are actually fully correct. This is shown
> by fact that 'make check'
Quite a few of the tests have a need to mock the stat() / lstat()
functions and they are taking somewhat different & inconsistent
approaches none of which are actually fully correct. This is shown
by fact that 'make check' fails on 32-bit hosts. Investigation
revealed that the code was calling
