On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 03:40:37PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 02:16:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 03:13:03PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:46:01AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > The Win32
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 02:16:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 03:13:03PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:46:01AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> The Win32 platform can not do link time overrides in the same way
> that we can on POSIX /
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 03:13:03PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:46:01AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > The Win32 platform can not do link time overrides in the same way
> > that we can on POSIX / ELF based platforms, so we cannot build
> > the virfilewrapper.c
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:46:01AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The Win32 platform can not do link time overrides in the same way
that we can on POSIX / ELF based platforms, so we cannot build
the virfilewrapper.c code reliably. Just stub it out on Win32
so it is a no-op. Tests that use this
The Win32 platform can not do link time overrides in the same way
that we can on POSIX / ELF based platforms, so we cannot build
the virfilewrapper.c code reliably. Just stub it out on Win32
so it is a no-op. Tests that use this file are already written
to skip on Win32.
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. B
