On 07/09/14 15:01, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/09/2014 02:05 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> The commit referenced above changed function arguments of
>> virStorageFileGetMetadataFromBuf() but didn't tweak the
>> ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL tied to them. This was caught by coverity as it
>> actually obeys them. We
On 07/09/2014 02:05 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> The commit referenced above changed function arguments of
> virStorageFileGetMetadataFromBuf() but didn't tweak the
> ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL tied to them. This was caught by coverity as it
> actually obeys them. We disabled them for GCC and thus it didn't sh
On 07/09/14 10:12, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 09.07.2014 10:05, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> The commit referenced above changed function arguments of
>> virStorageFileGetMetadataFromBuf() but didn't tweak the
>> ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL tied to them. This was caught by coverity as it
>> actually obeys them.
On 09.07.2014 10:05, Peter Krempa wrote:
The commit referenced above changed function arguments of
virStorageFileGetMetadataFromBuf() but didn't tweak the
ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL tied to them. This was caught by coverity as it
actually obeys them. We disabled them for GCC and thus it didn't show
up.
A
The commit referenced above changed function arguments of
virStorageFileGetMetadataFromBuf() but didn't tweak the
ATTRIBUTE_NONNULL tied to them. This was caught by coverity as it
actually obeys them. We disabled them for GCC and thus it didn't show
up.
Additionally in commit 3ea661deeabadc3c114df
