On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 03:15:44AM -0700, Quentin Machu wrote:
> An unexpected behavior in systemd has been introduced between the versions
> 225 and 229: when non-existing units are specified in After/Before clauses,
> systemd fails if the After clause is listed first. What is expected is that
>
An unexpected behavior in systemd has been introduced between the versions
225 and 229: when non-existing units are specified in After/Before clauses,
systemd fails if the After clause is listed first. What is expected is that
systemd simply ignores these clauses. Because the After clause is
