On 07/25/2011 03:33 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
On 07/15/2011 07:38 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Now that virDomainSetVcpusFlags knows about VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CURRENT,
so should virDomainGetVcpusFlags.
Unfortunately, the virsh counterpart 'virsh vcpucount' has already
commandeered --current for a different
On 07/15/2011 07:38 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Now that virDomainSetVcpusFlags knows about VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CURRENT,
so should virDomainGetVcpusFlags.
Unfortunately, the virsh counterpart 'virsh vcpucount' has already
commandeered --current for a different meaning, so virsh does not
have a way to ex
On 07/15/2011 05:38 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Now that virDomainSetVcpusFlags knows about VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CURRENT,
so should virDomainGetVcpusFlags.
Unfortunately, the virsh counterpart 'virsh vcpucount' has already
commandeered --current for a different meaning, so virsh does not
have a way to ex
Now that virDomainSetVcpusFlags knows about VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CURRENT,
so should virDomainGetVcpusFlags.
Unfortunately, the virsh counterpart 'virsh vcpucount' has already
commandeered --current for a different meaning, so virsh does not
have a way to expose this new calling capability unless we e