On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/16/2012 03:51 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 12:39:45 -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:24:07PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>
>> NACK to this patch. I think the current command na
On 11/16/2012 03:51 AM, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 12:39:45 -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:24:07PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> NACK to this patch. I think the current command names are good.
> Creating duplicates will make life wor
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 12:39:45 -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
> >> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:24:07PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >>>
> >>> NACK to this patch. I think the current command names are good.
> >>> Creating duplicates will make life worse. First, it creates
> >>> divergance from the
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:59:16PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873344 suggested that
>> the grouping 'boot', 'shutdown', 'reboot'; as well as the grouping
>> 'start', 'stop', 'restart'; might be easier to remember than the
On 11/08/2012 11:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 10:51:14AM -0500, Dave Allan wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:24:07PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:59:16PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 08:55:27AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 07:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:59:16PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873344 suggested that
> >> the grouping 'boot', 'shutdown', 'reboot'; as w
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 10:30:55AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Thu, November 8, 2012 09:24, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> >
> > NACK to this patch. I think the current command names are good.
> > Creating duplicates will make life worse. First, it creates
> > divergance from the similarly
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 10:51:14AM -0500, Dave Allan wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:24:07PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:59:16PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873344 suggested that
> > > the grouping 'boot', 'shutd
On 11/08/2012 07:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:59:16PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873344 suggested that
>> the grouping 'boot', 'shutdown', 'reboot'; as well as the grouping
>> 'start', 'stop', 'restart'; might be easier t
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 03:24:07PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:59:16PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873344 suggested that
> > the grouping 'boot', 'shutdown', 'reboot'; as well as the grouping
> > 'start', 'stop', 'restar
On Thu, November 8, 2012 09:24, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> NACK to this patch. I think the current command names are good.
> Creating duplicates will make life worse. First, it creates
> divergance from the similarly named commands for networks,
> storage and other objects. It also means scrip
On 11/08/2012 03:25 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
The 'shutdown' and 'reboot' commands use terms that apply to the
operating system, because they *are* controlling the operating
system, not the virtual machine. They directly result in the
guest OS commands 'shutdown' and 'reboot' being invoked.
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:30:15AM +0100, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 08:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> >
> >This patch documents both spellings. An alternative would be to
> >leave the alternate spellings as hidden aliases (virsh has support
> >for that), but still mention them in virsh
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:59:16PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873344 suggested that
> the grouping 'boot', 'shutdown', 'reboot'; as well as the grouping
> 'start', 'stop', 'restart'; might be easier to remember than the
> current mix of 'start', 'shutdown
On 11/06/2012 07:31 AM, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 03:30 AM, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
>> On 11/05/2012 08:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> @@ -1523,6 +1524,7 @@ be hot-plugged the next time the domain is
>>> booted. As such, it must only be
>>> used with the I<--config> flag, and not with t
On 11/06/2012 02:01 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>>> =item B I [I<--mode acpi|agent>]
>>> +=item B I [I<--mode acpi|agent>]
>>>
>>> Reboot a domain. This acts just as if the domain had the B
>>> command run from the console. The command returns as soon as it has
>> Now it would be a good time to
On 11/06/2012 03:30 AM, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 08:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> @@ -1523,6 +1524,7 @@ be hot-plugged the next time the domain is
>> booted. As such, it must only be
>> used with the I<--config> flag, and not with the I<--live> flag.
>>
>> =item B I [I<--mode ac
On 11/06/12 09:30, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote:
On 11/05/2012 08:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
This patch documents both spellings. An alternative would be to
leave the alternate spellings as hidden aliases (virsh has support
for that), but still mention them in virsh.pod (see how we did an
alias for
On 11/05/2012 08:59 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
This patch documents both spellings. An alternative would be to
leave the alternate spellings as hidden aliases (virsh has support
for that), but still mention them in virsh.pod (see how we did an
alias for nodedev-dettach, for reference).
In my opinion
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> On 11/05/2012 03:53 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/05/12 20:59, Eric Blake wrote:
>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873344 suggested that
the grouping 'boot', 'shutdown', 're
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 03:53 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
>> On 11/05/12 20:59, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873344 suggested that
>>> the grouping 'boot', 'shutdown', 'reboot'; as well as the grouping
>>> 'start', 'stop',
On 11/05/2012 03:53 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On 11/05/12 20:59, Eric Blake wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873344 suggested that
>> the grouping 'boot', 'shutdown', 'reboot'; as well as the grouping
>> 'start', 'stop', 'restart'; might be easier to remember than the
>> curren
On 11/05/12 20:59, Eric Blake wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873344 suggested that
the grouping 'boot', 'shutdown', 'reboot'; as well as the grouping
'start', 'stop', 'restart'; might be easier to remember than the
current mix of 'start', 'shutdown', 'reboot'.
* tools/virsh-d
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:59:16PM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873344 suggested that
> the grouping 'boot', 'shutdown', 'reboot'; as well as the grouping
> 'start', 'stop', 'restart'; might be easier to remember than the
> current mix of 'start', 'shutdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873344 suggested that
the grouping 'boot', 'shutdown', 'reboot'; as well as the grouping
'start', 'stop', 'restart'; might be easier to remember than the
current mix of 'start', 'shutdown', 'reboot'.
* tools/virsh-domain.c (domManagementCmds): Add other
25 matches
Mail list logo
