On 08/28/2013 10:31 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 17.08.2013 00:14, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Noticed while reviewing another patch that had an accidental
>> mismatch due to refactoring. An audit of the code showed that
>> very few callers of vshCommandOpt were expecting a return of
>> -2, indicatin
On 17.08.2013 00:14, Eric Blake wrote:
> Noticed while reviewing another patch that had an accidental
> mismatch due to refactoring. An audit of the code showed that
> very few callers of vshCommandOpt were expecting a return of
> -2, indicating programmer error, and of those that DID check,
> the
Noticed while reviewing another patch that had an accidental
mismatch due to refactoring. An audit of the code showed that
very few callers of vshCommandOpt were expecting a return of
-2, indicating programmer error, and of those that DID check,
they just propagated that status to yet another call