On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 04:07:48PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 05:04:05PM +0100, Guido G?nther wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:39:57AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Yeha, this is almost certainly just another example of XenD not properly
cleaning up /
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:39:57AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Yeha, this is almost certainly just another example of XenD not properly
cleaning up / destroying domains. If you still have a machine which
shows this behaviour, then I'd recommend trying this change to our Xen
impl
In
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 05:04:05PM +0100, Guido G?nther wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 11:39:57AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Yeha, this is almost certainly just another example of XenD not properly
cleaning up / destroying domains. If you still have a machine which
shows this
