On 30.10.2012 08:28, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> 29.10.2012 17:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>>> This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309
>>>
>>> If one has USB disks configured for domain with e
29.10.2012 17:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
>> This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309
>>
>> If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit , libvirtd
>> ignores that node when building
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
> This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309
>
> If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit , libvirtd
> ignores that node when building qemu command line. So, disk is connected to
> th
This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309
If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit , libvirtd
ignores that node when building qemu command line. So, disk is connected to
the first free USB port implicitly by qemu.
That breaks other USB devices which