Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/2] qemu: Fix is ignored for USB disks

2012-10-30 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 30.10.2012 08:28, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > 29.10.2012 17:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >>> This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309 >>> >>> If one has USB disks configured for domain with e

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/2] qemu: Fix is ignored for USB disks

2012-10-30 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
29.10.2012 17:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: >> This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309 >> >> If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit , libvirtd >> ignores that node when building

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/2] qemu: Fix is ignored for USB disks

2012-10-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309 > > If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit , libvirtd > ignores that node when building qemu command line. So, disk is connected to > th

[libvirt] [PATCH 0/2] qemu: Fix is ignored for USB disks

2012-10-26 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309 If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit , libvirtd ignores that node when building qemu command line. So, disk is connected to the first free USB port implicitly by qemu. That breaks other USB devices which