29.10.2012 17:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309
If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit address/, libvirtd
ignores that node when building
On 30.10.2012 08:28, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
29.10.2012 17:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309
If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote:
This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309
If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit address/, libvirtd
ignores that node when building qemu command line. So, disk is connected to
This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309
If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit address/, libvirtd
ignores that node when building qemu command line. So, disk is connected to
the first free USB port implicitly by qemu.
That breaks other USB