Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/2] qemu: Fix address/ is ignored for USB disks

2012-10-30 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
29.10.2012 17:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309 If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit address/, libvirtd ignores that node when building

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/2] qemu: Fix address/ is ignored for USB disks

2012-10-30 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 30.10.2012 08:28, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: 29.10.2012 17:31, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309 If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/2] qemu: Fix address/ is ignored for USB disks

2012-10-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:08:41AM +, Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309 If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit address/, libvirtd ignores that node when building qemu command line. So, disk is connected to

[libvirt] [PATCH 0/2] qemu: Fix address/ is ignored for USB disks

2012-10-26 Thread Vladislav Bogdanov
This is a follow-up to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861309 If one has USB disks configured for domain with explicit address/, libvirtd ignores that node when building qemu command line. So, disk is connected to the first free USB port implicitly by qemu. That breaks other USB