Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] Support for marking domains as tainted

2011-05-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 08:33:09PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote: On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:28:45PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: There are various configurations for virtual domains that we allow, but do not wish to actively support in production environments. The support situation is

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] Support for marking domains as tainted

2011-05-05 Thread Dave Allan
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:28:45PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: There are various configurations for virtual domains that we allow, but do not wish to actively support in production environments. The support situation is similar to that of binary only or non-GPL kernel modules, so borrow

[libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] Support for marking domains as tainted

2011-05-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
There are various configurations for virtual domains that we allow, but do not wish to actively support in production environments. The support situation is similar to that of binary only or non-GPL kernel modules, so borrow the kernel's idea of tainting. When an undesirable configuration is used

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] Support for marking domains as tainted

2011-05-04 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 12:28:45PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: There are various configurations for virtual domains that we allow, but do not wish to actively support in production environments. The support situation is similar to that of binary only or non-GPL kernel modules, so borrow