Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: Add a test suite for libxl_domain_config generator

2017-07-30 Thread Jim Fehlig
On 07/28/2017 05:33 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:24:10PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: >> On 07/27/2017 04:51 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:24:38PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: >>> Did you have any comment on the approach

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: Add a test suite for libxl_domain_config generator

2017-07-28 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:24:10PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 07/27/2017 04:51 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:24:38PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > > > >> Did you have any comment on the approach taken in the attachments to this > >> thread? Particularly the

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: Add a test suite for libxl_domain_config generator

2017-07-28 Thread Jim Fehlig
On 07/27/2017 04:51 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:24:38PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > >> Did you have any comment on the approach taken in the attachments to this >> thread? Particularly the patch titled "libxl: make emulator checks >> mockable"? > I don't see

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: Add a test suite for libxl_domain_config generator

2017-07-27 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 03:24:38PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 07/26/2017 05:07 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 05:59:57PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > > > On 07/01/2017 08:16 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 07:02:24PM -0700,

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: Add a test suite for libxl_domain_config generator

2017-07-27 Thread Jim Fehlig
On 07/26/2017 05:07 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 05:59:57PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: On 07/01/2017 08:16 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 07:02:24PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: Long ago danpb posted some patches to test libvirt domXML

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: Add a test suite for libxl_domain_config generator

2017-07-26 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 05:59:57PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 07/01/2017 08:16 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 07:02:24PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > > > Long ago danpb posted some patches to test libvirt domXML to > > > libxl_domain_config conversion > > > > >

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: Add a test suite for libxl_domain_config generator

2017-07-14 Thread Jim Fehlig
On 07/01/2017 08:16 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 07:02:24PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: Long ago danpb posted some patches to test libvirt domXML to libxl_domain_config conversion https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-May/msg01102.html Some of the

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: Add a test suite for libxl_domain_config generator

2017-07-13 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 04:16:02AM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 07:02:24PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > > Long ago danpb posted some patches to test libvirt domXML to > > libxl_domain_config conversion > > > >

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: Add a test suite for libxl_domain_config generator

2017-07-01 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 07:02:24PM -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Long ago danpb posted some patches to test libvirt domXML to > libxl_domain_config conversion > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-May/msg01102.html > > Some of the prerequisite patches were pushed, but we've never

[libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] libxl: Add a test suite for libxl_domain_config generator

2017-02-26 Thread Jim Fehlig
Long ago danpb posted some patches to test libvirt domXML to libxl_domain_config conversion https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-May/msg01102.html Some of the prerequisite patches were pushed, but we've never managed to push patches actually providing the conversion tests. I sent