Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2016-01-11 Thread John Ferlan
On 01/11/2016 06:38 AM, Henning Schild wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:05:59 -0500 > John Ferlan wrote: > >> I'm leaning towards something in the test. I'll check if reverting these changes alters the results. I don't imagine it will. >>> >>> The real question

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2016-01-11 Thread Henning Schild
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:05:59 -0500 John Ferlan wrote: > > >> > >> I'm leaning towards something in the test. I'll check if reverting > >> these changes alters the results. I don't imagine it will. > > > > The real question is which thread it fails on and at what point in > >

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2016-01-11 Thread Henning Schild
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:05:11 -0500 John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 01/11/2016 06:38 AM, Henning Schild wrote: > > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 11:05:59 -0500 > > John Ferlan wrote: > > > >> > > I'm leaning towards something in the test. I'll check if >

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2016-01-08 Thread John Ferlan
>> >> I'm leaning towards something in the test. I'll check if reverting >> these changes alters the results. I don't imagine it will. > > The real question is which thread it fails on and at what point in > time. My patches only changed the order of operations where threads > enter the cpuset

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2016-01-08 Thread Henning Schild
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:56:33 -0500 John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 01/07/2016 02:01 PM, Henning Schild wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:20:23 -0500 > > John Ferlan wrote: > > > >> > >> [...] > >> > No problem - although it seems they've generated a

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2016-01-08 Thread John Ferlan
>> >> I'm leaning towards something in the test. I'll check if reverting >> these changes alters the results. I don't imagine it will. > > The real question is which thread it fails on and at what point in > time. My patches only changed the order of operations where threads > enter the cpuset

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2016-01-07 Thread John Ferlan
On 01/07/2016 02:01 PM, Henning Schild wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:20:23 -0500 > John Ferlan wrote: > >> >> [...] >> No problem - although it seems they've generated a regression in the virttest memtune test suite. I'm 'technically' on vacation for the

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2016-01-07 Thread John Ferlan
[...] >> No problem - although it seems they've generated a regression in the >> virttest memtune test suite. I'm 'technically' on vacation for the >> next couple of weeks; however, I think/perhaps the problem is a >> result of this patch and the change to adding the task to the cgroup >> at

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2016-01-07 Thread Henning Schild
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 11:20:23 -0500 John Ferlan wrote: > > [...] > > >> No problem - although it seems they've generated a regression in > >> the virttest memtune test suite. I'm 'technically' on vacation > >> for the next couple of weeks; however, I think/perhaps the

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2015-12-21 Thread Henning Schild
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:27:54 -0500 John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 11/13/2015 11:56 AM, Henning Schild wrote: > > Hi, > > > > i already explained some of the cgroup problems in some detail so i > > will not do that again. > >

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2015-12-21 Thread Henning Schild
On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:44:32 -0500 John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 12/21/2015 03:36 AM, Henning Schild wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:27:54 -0500 > > John Ferlan wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 11/13/2015 11:56 AM, Henning Schild wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> >

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2015-12-21 Thread John Ferlan
On 12/21/2015 03:36 AM, Henning Schild wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 16:27:54 -0500 > John Ferlan wrote: > >> >> >> On 11/13/2015 11:56 AM, Henning Schild wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> i already explained some of the cgroup problems in some detail so i >>> will not do that again.

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2015-12-14 Thread John Ferlan
On 11/13/2015 11:56 AM, Henning Schild wrote: > Hi, > > i already explained some of the cgroup problems in some detail so i > will not do that again. > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-October/msg00876.html > > I managed to solve some of the problems in the current codebase,

[libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] several cgroups/cpuset fixes

2015-11-13 Thread Henning Schild
Hi, i already explained some of the cgroup problems in some detail so i will not do that again. https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2015-October/msg00876.html I managed to solve some of the problems in the current codebase, and am now sharing the patches. But they are really just half of