On 8/2/11 4:15 AM, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 09:16:09PM -0400, Dave Allan wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:56:58PM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
>>> This patch tries to fix getPhysFn in macvtap.c to get the physical
>>> function(PF) of the direct attach interface,
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 09:16:09PM -0400, Dave Allan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:56:58PM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> > This patch tries to fix getPhysFn in macvtap.c to get the physical
> > function(PF) of the direct attach interface, if the interface is a SR-IOV
> > VF.
> > It derives t
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:56:58PM -0700, Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> This patch tries to fix getPhysFn in macvtap.c to get the physical
> function(PF) of the direct attach interface, if the interface is a SR-IOV VF.
> It derives the PF/VF relationship from sysfs.
>
> There is some code to do this in n
This patch tries to fix getPhysFn in macvtap.c to get the physical
function(PF) of the direct attach interface, if the interface is a SR-IOV VF.
It derives the PF/VF relationship from sysfs.
There is some code to do this in node device driver. But it is local
to the node device driver . I did not
