Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/5] RFC: configure inactive domains' maximum memory size

2011-03-22 Thread Taku Izumi
Daniel, Eric, Wen, Thank you for reviewing. I'll respin according to Daniel's point. Thank you. Taku Izumi -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/5] RFC: configure inactive domains' maximum memory size

2011-03-21 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:25:42AM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote: Hi all, This patchset enables us to configure inactive domain's maximum memory size. The basic technique is the same as that of virsh setmem command. = http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-March/msg00013.html

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/5] RFC: configure inactive domains' maximum memory size

2011-03-21 Thread Eric Blake
On 03/21/2011 01:58 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote: Rather than add a new API, now that we have virDomainSetMemoryFlags() I don't see why we could not use and extra flag on that API, VIR_DOMAIN_MAX_MEM and use the same entry point. Agreed, and this was how I handled the vcpu issue (we had

[libvirt] [PATCH 0/5] RFC: configure inactive domains' maximum memory size

2011-03-17 Thread Taku Izumi
Hi all, This patchset enables us to configure inactive domain's maximum memory size. The basic technique is the same as that of virsh setmem command. = http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-March/msg00013.html *[PATCH 1/5] [RESEND] setmaxmem: remove the code to invoke