Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/6] Clarify semantic of virDomain(G|S)et*Parameters functions

2011-05-18 Thread Matthias Bolte
2011/5/18 Daniel Veillard : > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:21:07PM +0200, Matthias Bolte wrote: >> This series was inspired by the discusion about invalid argument checking >> in the public API and the unclear semantic of this functions. >> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-May/msg0

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/6] Clarify semantic of virDomain(G|S)et*Parameters functions

2011-05-18 Thread Daniel Veillard
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:21:07PM +0200, Matthias Bolte wrote: > This series was inspired by the discusion about invalid argument checking > in the public API and the unclear semantic of this functions. > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-May/msg01105.html > > Clarify that the g

[libvirt] [PATCH 0/6] Clarify semantic of virDomain(G|S)et*Parameters functions

2011-05-18 Thread Matthias Bolte
This series was inspired by the discusion about invalid argument checking in the public API and the unclear semantic of this functions. https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-May/msg01105.html Clarify that the getter functions don't allow to obtain a subset of the parameters. You can on