Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for QEMU < 0.12.0

2015-11-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 11:05:53AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/05/2015 10:47 AM, Cole Robinson wrote: > > On 11/05/2015 12:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >> The patches for introducing virtlogd will be significantly > >> simplified if we don't need to worry about parsing stderr > >>

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for QEMU < 0.12.0

2015-11-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 06:15:52PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 11/05/2015 12:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > The patches for introducing virtlogd will be significantly > > simplified if we don't need to worry about parsing stderr > > during startup. This is required prior to QEMU

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for QEMU < 0.12.0

2015-11-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 07:42:35AM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 17:33:52 +, Daniel Berrange wrote: > > The patches for introducing virtlogd will be significantly > > simplified if we don't need to worry about parsing stderr > > during startup. This is required prior to

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for QEMU < 0.12.0

2015-11-06 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 05:33:52PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > The patches for introducing virtlogd will be significantly > simplified if we don't need to worry about parsing stderr > during startup. This is required prior to QEMU 0.11 so > that we can get the dyanamically allocated

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for QEMU < 0.12.0

2015-11-05 Thread Cole Robinson
On 11/05/2015 12:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > The patches for introducing virtlogd will be significantly > simplified if we don't need to worry about parsing stderr > during startup. This is required prior to QEMU 0.11 so > that we can get the dyanamically allocated /dev/pty/NNN > paths. >

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for QEMU < 0.12.0

2015-11-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 12:47:41PM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 11/05/2015 12:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > The patches for introducing virtlogd will be significantly > > simplified if we don't need to worry about parsing stderr > > during startup. This is required prior to QEMU 0.11 so

[libvirt] [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for QEMU < 0.12.0

2015-11-05 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
The patches for introducing virtlogd will be significantly simplified if we don't need to worry about parsing stderr during startup. This is required prior to QEMU 0.11 so that we can get the dyanamically allocated /dev/pty/NNN paths. The QEMU 0.12.1 release was shipped in RHEL-6 vintage distros

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for QEMU < 0.12.0

2015-11-05 Thread Eric Blake
On 11/05/2015 10:47 AM, Cole Robinson wrote: > On 11/05/2015 12:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> The patches for introducing virtlogd will be significantly >> simplified if we don't need to worry about parsing stderr >> during startup. This is required prior to QEMU 0.11 so >> that we can get

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for QEMU < 0.12.0

2015-11-05 Thread John Ferlan
On 11/05/2015 12:33 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > The patches for introducing virtlogd will be significantly > simplified if we don't need to worry about parsing stderr > during startup. This is required prior to QEMU 0.11 so > that we can get the dyanamically allocated /dev/pty/NNN > paths. >

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/7] Drop support for QEMU < 0.12.0

2015-11-05 Thread Peter Krempa
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 17:33:52 +, Daniel Berrange wrote: > The patches for introducing virtlogd will be significantly > simplified if we don't need to worry about parsing stderr > during startup. This is required prior to QEMU 0.11 so > that we can get the dyanamically allocated /dev/pty/NNN