Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 00/11] Allow creation of vHBA by parent_wwnn/wwpn or fabric_name

2016-12-13 Thread John Ferlan
On 12/12/2016 07:50 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 12/03/2016 07:09 AM, John Ferlan wrote: >> >> ping? > > Sorry, I seem to have lost your initial cover letter so responding here... > >> >> On 11/18/2016 09:26 AM, John Ferlan wrote: >>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349696 >>> >>> Lo

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 00/11] Allow creation of vHBA by parent_wwnn/wwpn or fabric_name

2016-12-12 Thread Jim Fehlig
On 12/03/2016 07:09 AM, John Ferlan wrote: ping? Sorry, I seem to have lost your initial cover letter so responding here... On 11/18/2016 09:26 AM, John Ferlan wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349696 Lots of details in the bz, but essentially the problem is that providi

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 00/11] Allow creation of vHBA by parent_wwnn/wwpn or fabric_name

2016-12-03 Thread John Ferlan
ping? Tks - John On 11/18/2016 09:26 AM, John Ferlan wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349696 > > Lots of details in the bz, but essentially the problem is that providing > a "parent" scsi_hostX value has drawbacks on reboots because what was > scsi_hostX could turn into sc

[libvirt] [PATCH 00/11] Allow creation of vHBA by parent_wwnn/wwpn or fabric_name

2016-11-18 Thread John Ferlan
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349696 Lots of details in the bz, but essentially the problem is that providing a "parent" scsi_hostX value has drawbacks on reboots because what was scsi_hostX could turn into scsi_hostY on subsequent reboots. So add the ability to use the parent wwnn