Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 00/12] More cleanup from IOThreads changes

2015-03-16 Thread John Ferlan
On 03/13/2015 11:11 PM, John Ferlan wrote: > During the review process a few things were pointed at as perhaps > needing some adjustments based on what was done for IOThreads. > Specifically a memory leak in PinVcpuFlags since PinIOThreads was > just a copy of the Vcpu code and secondarily since

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 00/12] More cleanup from IOThreads changes

2015-03-16 Thread Ján Tomko
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:11:44PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote: > During the review process a few things were pointed at as perhaps > needing some adjustments based on what was done for IOThreads. > Specifically a memory leak in PinVcpuFlags since PinIOThreads was > just a copy of the Vcpu code and se

[libvirt] [PATCH 00/12] More cleanup from IOThreads changes

2015-03-13 Thread John Ferlan
During the review process a few things were pointed at as perhaps needing some adjustments based on what was done for IOThreads. Specifically a memory leak in PinVcpuFlags since PinIOThreads was just a copy of the Vcpu code and secondarily since the IOThreads code "reused" the virDomainVcpuPin* dat