On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:22:18PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 17.12.2012 15:57, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Currently the files in src/util are 50/50 split between those
> > having a 'vir' prefix and those which don't. Finish the job
> > by remaining all remaining files to have a 'vir' p
On 17.12.2012 15:57, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Currently the files in src/util are 50/50 split between those
> having a 'vir' prefix and those which don't. Finish the job
> by remaining all remaining files to have a 'vir' prefix too,
> guaranteeing that they can't clash with system headers[1].
>
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:45:59PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 17.12.2012 15:57, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Currently the files in src/util are 50/50 split between those
> > having a 'vir' prefix and those which don't. Finish the job
> > by remaining all remaining files to have a 'vir' p
On 17.12.2012 15:57, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Currently the files in src/util are 50/50 split between those
> having a 'vir' prefix and those which don't. Finish the job
> by remaining all remaining files to have a 'vir' prefix too,
> guaranteeing that they can't clash with system headers[1].
>
Currently the files in src/util are 50/50 split between those
having a 'vir' prefix and those which don't. Finish the job
by remaining all remaining files to have a 'vir' prefix too,
guaranteeing that they can't clash with system headers[1].
The only case which was not a plain rename, was merging
