On Fri, 2015-12-04 at 09:46 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:06 -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
> > Instead of creating this new function, how about if we change
> > virPCIDevice to contain a virPCIDeviceAddress rather than individual
> > domain, bus, slot, and function?
>
> I
On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 14:06 -0500, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 12/02/2015 12:39 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > This is a straightforward wrapper around
> > virPCIDeviceAddressIOMMUGroupIterate() that will make some code less
> > awkward to write later on.
> > ---
> > src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
On 12/02/2015 12:39 PM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
This is a straightforward wrapper around
virPCIDeviceAddressIOMMUGroupIterate() that will make some code less
awkward to write later on.
---
src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
src/util/virpci.c| 26 ++
This is a straightforward wrapper around
virPCIDeviceAddressIOMMUGroupIterate() that will make some code less
awkward to write later on.
---
src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
src/util/virpci.c| 26 ++
src/util/virpci.h| 8 ++--
3 files changed, 33
