On 2013年02月28日 14:27, Li Zhang wrote:
On 2013年02月28日 07:13, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/27/2013 05:13 AM, Li Zhang wrote:
Hi Eric,
This should belong to bug-fix, could it be pushed to 1.0.3?
Without any test case under 'make check' that exposes the failure, I'm a
bit worried that this might
Hi Eric,
This should belong to bug-fix, could it be pushed to 1.0.3?
Thanks.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Li Zhang zhlci...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Li Zhang zhlci...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
When getting CPUs' information, it assumes that CPU indexes
are not contiguous. But for ppc64
On 2013年02月28日 07:13, Eric Blake wrote:
On 02/27/2013 05:13 AM, Li Zhang wrote:
Hi Eric,
This should belong to bug-fix, could it be pushed to 1.0.3?
Without any test case under 'make check' that exposes the failure, I'm a
bit worried that this might cause regressions on other setups. I'm not
From: Li Zhang zhlci...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
When getting CPUs' information, it assumes that CPU indexes
are not contiguous. But for ppc64 platform, CPU indexes are not
contiguous because SMT is needed to be disabled, so CPU information
is not right on ppc64 and vpuinfo, vcpupin can't work
