On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 04:15:27PM +0200, Pritesh Kothari wrote:
Hi All,
As per the discussion earlier on the list I have modified the rdp type and
added a new desktop type and posting the patch for same.
Okay, this looks fine, but we also need a description of the format
extensions in
Hi All,
As per the discussion earlier on the list I have modified the rdp type and
added a new desktop type and posting the patch for same.
Regards,
Pritesh
diff --git a/docs/schemas/domain.rng b/docs/schemas/domain.rng
index 2f784e1..5e4aa5b 100644
--- a/docs/schemas/domain.rng
+++
true. no need for that.
Actually I believe there is. I think what was originally meant was
whether the domain would be able to do real accelerated 3D using the
host hardware, from the guest.
VBox provides an option to make 3D calls on the virtualized video card
call the real 3D api of the
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 09:35:20PM +0200, Florian Vichot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Isn't 3D support implied by the type of graphics card emulated ?
eg cirrus is a 2d only card, so it seems like 3Daccel is redundant.
Similarly if the graphics model were a 3d
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:21:23AM +0200, Pritesh Kothari wrote:
Hi All,
I have added support for RDP.
So, summarizing your suggested XML syntax, it more or less looked
like this:
graphics type='rdp' port='12345' listen='172.21.4.3' autoport='no'
headless='yes'
Hi Daniel,
graphics type='desktop'/
graphics type='rdp' port='1234' autoport='no' listen='172.21.4.3'/
this seems ok, but the only question I have is, currently libvirt supports
only one virDomainGraphicsDef, so is it ok for me add support for more then
one virDomainGraphicsDef? or else
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:32:24PM +0200, Pritesh Kothari wrote:
Hi Daniel,
graphics type='desktop'/
graphics type='rdp' port='1234' autoport='no' listen='172.21.4.3'/
this seems ok, but the only question I have is, currently libvirt supports
only one virDomainGraphicsDef, so is it
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:32:24PM +0200, Pritesh Kothari wrote:
Hi Daniel,
graphics type='desktop'/
graphics type='rdp' port='1234' autoport='no' listen='172.21.4.3'/
this seems ok, but the only question I have is, currently libvirt supports
only one virDomainGraphicsDef, so is it
Hi Daniel,
yes this is a limitation of the impelentation, not of the model, it
makes more sense to allow multiple graphis entries.
Ok, will do this.
feedback about attributes (auth='external' authtimeout='1234') would also
be appreciated. Thanks.
auth='external' sounds unclear,
Hi Daniel,
We don't currently have any explicit representation of a video card
device. The graphics tag is really representing the host I/O
layer, covering video, mouse, keyboard (and potentially audio
too).
I didn't get you here? i mean there is a seperate virDomainSoundDefPtr,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:41:25PM +0200, Pritesh Kothari wrote:
Hi Daniel,
We don't currently have any explicit representation of a video card
device. The graphics tag is really representing the host I/O
layer, covering video, mouse, keyboard (and potentially audio
too).
I didn't
On 04/23/09 12:43, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Historically with Xen and QEMU there has only been ability to have either
SDL graphics, or VNC graphics, but not both.
Note that this has changed recently, qemu can handle both vnc and sdl now.
graphics type='desktop'/
graphics type='rdp'
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:47:17PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:41:25PM +0200, Pritesh Kothari wrote:
I think we need to add an explicit tag to represent video devices
real soon. At very least we need to be able to indicate the type
of video card - QEMU
On Thursday 23 April 2009 14:47:17 Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:41:25PM +0200, Pritesh Kothari wrote:
Hi Daniel,
We don't currently have any explicit representation of a video card
device. The graphics tag is really representing the host I/O
layer, covering
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:56:46PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:47:17PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:41:25PM +0200, Pritesh Kothari wrote:
I think we need to add an explicit tag to represent video devices
real soon. At very
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:13:18PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:56:46PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 01:47:17PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:41:25PM +0200, Pritesh Kothari wrote:
I think we need to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Isn't 3D support implied by the type of graphics card emulated ?
eg cirrus is a 2d only card, so it seems like 3Daccel is redundant.
Similarly if the graphics model were a 3d card.
true. no need for that.
Actually I believe there is. I think
17 matches
Mail list logo
