On 01/12/2016 11:03 AM, Joe Harvell wrote:
> Le 11/01/2016 17:32, John Ferlan a écrit :
>>
>> On 01/11/2016 12:50 PM, Joe Harvell wrote:
John/Jan:
I actually made a patch similar to this and was about to submit it for
review. Now I see there is a more thorough version here
Le 11/01/2016 17:32, John Ferlan a écrit :
On 01/11/2016 12:50 PM, Joe Harvell wrote:
John/Jan:
I actually made a patch similar to this and was about to submit it for
review. Now I see there is a more thorough version here already
submitted just over a year ago. I don't see any evidence of
On 01/11/2016 12:50 PM, Joe Harvell wrote:
>> John/Jan:
>>
>> I actually made a patch similar to this and was about to submit it for
>> review. Now I see there is a more thorough version here already
>> submitted just over a year ago. I don't see any evidence of this in
>> the git repo. Are
John/Jan:
I actually made a patch similar to this and was about to submit it for
review. Now I see there is a more thorough version here already
submitted just over a year ago. I don't see any evidence of this in the
git repo. Are there any plans to commit it?
---
Joe Harvell
--
John/Jan:
I actually made a patch similar to this and was about to submit it for
review. Now I see there is a more thorough version here already
submitted just over a year ago. I don't see any evidence of this in
the git repo. Are there any plans to commit it?
---
Joe Harvell
--
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:14:29PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
Commit id '1ffc78b5' was supposed to support for thin logical volumes;
however, instead it added support for thin snapshot volumes. This worked
fine for a few releases of LVM; however, more recent versions (not sure
exactly which
On 12/16/2014 10:20 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:14:29PM -0500, John Ferlan wrote:
...snip...
I'm unclear still on what the difference is between a thin snapshot (with
no backing volume) and a thin volume ?
I've asked that question of someone from lvm...
The
On 12/12/2014 10:14 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
Commit id '1ffc78b5' was supposed to support for thin logical volumes;
however, instead it added support for thin snapshot volumes. This worked
fine for a few releases of LVM; however, more recent versions (not sure
exactly which one) made a
Commit id '1ffc78b5' was supposed to support for thin logical volumes;
however, instead it added support for thin snapshot volumes. This worked
fine for a few releases of LVM; however, more recent versions (not sure
exactly which one) made a differentiation between a thin snapshot volume
and a
