On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 14:45 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> > I think it would make more sense to reserve the address for these
> > devices in qemuDomainCollectPCIAddress() directly, along with the
> > other ones, eg. squash in the following diff:
> >
> > -- 8< -- 8< -- 8< --
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 01:14:58PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 13:05 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
@@ -1429,15 +1429,24 @@ qemuDomainValidateDevicePCISlotsPIIX3(virDomainDefPtr
def,
cont->info.addr.pci.slot = 1;
cont->info.addr.pci.function =
On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 13:05 +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:
> @@ -1429,15 +1429,24 @@ qemuDomainValidateDevicePCISlotsPIIX3(virDomainDefPtr
> def,
> cont->info.addr.pci.slot = 1;
> cont->info.addr.pci.function = 2;
> }
> +} else {
> +/* th
On 09/26/2017 07:05 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> Somewhere around commit 9ff9d9f reserving entire PCI slots was
> eliminated, as demonstrated by commit 6cc2014.
>
> Reserve the functions required by the implicit devices:
> 00:01.0 ISA Bridge
> 00:01.1 IDE Controller
> 00:01.2 USB Controller (unless US
Somewhere around commit 9ff9d9f reserving entire PCI slots was
eliminated, as demonstrated by commit 6cc2014.
Reserve the functions required by the implicit devices:
00:01.0 ISA Bridge
00:01.1 IDE Controller
00:01.2 USB Controller (unless USB is disabled)
00:01.3 Bridge
https://bugzilla.redhat.co
