On 10/07/2011 08:13 AM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 05:18:33PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
It was impossible for 'virsh snapshot-current dom name' to set name
as the current snapshot, if name is a disk-only snapshot.
Using strstr rather than full-blown xml parsing is safe, since
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 05:18:33PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> It was impossible for 'virsh snapshot-current dom name' to set name
> as the current snapshot, if name is a disk-only snapshot.
>
> Using strstr rather than full-blown xml parsing is safe, since the
> xml is assumed to be well-formed co
It was impossible for 'virsh snapshot-current dom name' to set name
as the current snapshot, if name is a disk-only snapshot.
Using strstr rather than full-blown xml parsing is safe, since the
xml is assumed to be well-formed coming from libvirtd rather than
arbitrary text coming from the user.
*