Currently, we share the idea of old new def with domains. Users can
*-edit an object (domain, pool) which spawns a new internal
representation for them. This is referenced via
{domainObj,poolObj}-newDef [compared to -def]. However, for pool we
were never overwriting def with newDef. This must be
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:32:47PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Currently, we share the idea of old new def with domains. Users can
*-edit an object (domain, pool) which spawns a new internal
representation for them. This is referenced via
{domainObj,poolObj}-newDef [compared to -def].
On 25.06.2012 12:36, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:32:47PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Currently, we share the idea of old new def with domains. Users can
*-edit an object (domain, pool) which spawns a new internal
representation for them. This is referenced via
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 01:13:48PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 25.06.2012 12:36, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:32:47PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Currently, we share the idea of old new def with domains. Users can
*-edit an object (domain, pool) which