Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-17 Thread Chun Yan Liu
>>> On 5/16/2016 at 06:14 PM, in message <57399d91.1030...@oracle.com>, Joao Martins wrote: > > On 05/13/2016 05:54 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > > On 05/13/2016 06:59 AM, Joao Martins wrote: > >> > >> On 05/12/2016 09:55 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > >>> Joao Martins

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-17 Thread Chun Yan Liu
>>> On 5/14/2016 at 12:54 AM, in message <573606ab.4080...@suse.com>, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 05/13/2016 06:59 AM, Joao Martins wrote: > > > > On 05/12/2016 09:55 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > >> Joao Martins wrote: > >>> On 05/12/2016 12:54 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-16 Thread Joao Martins
On 05/13/2016 05:54 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 05/13/2016 06:59 AM, Joao Martins wrote: >> >> On 05/12/2016 09:55 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: >>> Joao Martins wrote: On 05/12/2016 12:54 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 04/21/2016 05:10 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote: >> According to current xl.cfg docs

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-16 Thread Joao Martins
On 05/16/2016 09:57 AM, Chun Yan Liu wrote: > > On 5/14/2016 at 12:58 AM, in message <5736079b.5050...@suse.com>, Jim Fehlig > wrote: >> On 05/13/2016 07:08 AM, Joao Martins wrote: >>> I am not sure what's the etiquette in these cases but I sent you some >>

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-16 Thread Chun Yan Liu
>>> On 5/14/2016 at 12:58 AM, in message <5736079b.5050...@suse.com>, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 05/13/2016 07:08 AM, Joao Martins wrote: > > I am not sure what's the etiquette in these cases but I sent you some > patches > > that fixes the tests and makes some adjustments to

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-13 Thread Jim Fehlig
On 05/13/2016 07:08 AM, Joao Martins wrote: > I am not sure what's the etiquette in these cases but I sent you some patches > that fixes the tests and makes some adjustments to help out (all > changelog-ed). > There were a couple of failures lately regarding vram defaults and what not so > some

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-13 Thread Jim Fehlig
On 05/13/2016 06:59 AM, Joao Martins wrote: > > On 05/12/2016 09:55 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: >> Joao Martins wrote: >>> On 05/12/2016 12:54 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: On 04/21/2016 05:10 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote: > According to current xl.cfg docs and xl codes, it uses type=vif > instead of

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-13 Thread Joao Martins
On 05/13/2016 03:08 AM, Chun Yan Liu wrote: > > On 5/12/2016 at 11:00 PM, in message <57349a91.50...@oracle.com>, Joao Martins > wrote: >> On 05/12/2016 12:54 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: >>> On 04/21/2016 05:10 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote: According to

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-13 Thread Joao Martins
On 05/12/2016 09:55 PM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > Joao Martins wrote: >> On 05/12/2016 12:54 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: >>> On 04/21/2016 05:10 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote: According to current xl.cfg docs and xl codes, it uses type=vif instead of type=netfront. Currently after

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-12 Thread Chun Yan Liu
>>> On 5/12/2016 at 11:00 PM, in message <57349a91.50...@oracle.com>, Joao >>> Martins wrote: > On 05/12/2016 12:54 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > > On 04/21/2016 05:10 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote: > >> According to current xl.cfg docs and xl codes, it uses type=vif > >>

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-12 Thread Jim Fehlig
Joao Martins wrote: > On 05/12/2016 12:54 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: >> On 04/21/2016 05:10 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote: >>> According to current xl.cfg docs and xl codes, it uses type=vif >>> instead of type=netfront. >>> >>> Currently after domxml-to-native, libvirt xml model=netfront will be >>> converted

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-12 Thread Joao Martins
On 05/12/2016 12:54 AM, Jim Fehlig wrote: > On 04/21/2016 05:10 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote: >> According to current xl.cfg docs and xl codes, it uses type=vif >> instead of type=netfront. >> >> Currently after domxml-to-native, libvirt xml model=netfront will be >> converted to xl type=netfront. This

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-11 Thread Jim Fehlig
On 04/21/2016 05:10 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote: > According to current xl.cfg docs and xl codes, it uses type=vif > instead of type=netfront. > > Currently after domxml-to-native, libvirt xml model=netfront will be > converted to xl type=netfront. This has no problem before, xen codes > for a long time

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-05-10 Thread Joao Martins
On 04/21/2016 12:10 PM, Chunyan Liu wrote: > According to current xl.cfg docs and xl codes, it uses type=vif > instead of type=netfront. > > Currently after domxml-to-native, libvirt xml model=netfront will be > converted to xl type=netfront. This has no problem before, xen codes > for a long

[libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] xenFormatNet: correct `type=netfront' to 'type=vif' to match libxl

2016-04-21 Thread Chunyan Liu
According to current xl.cfg docs and xl codes, it uses type=vif instead of type=netfront. Currently after domxml-to-native, libvirt xml model=netfront will be converted to xl type=netfront. This has no problem before, xen codes for a long time just check type=ioemu, if not, set type to _VIF.