On 08/25/2017 02:30 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 04:47:03PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 08/23/2017 07:47 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
>>> We always truncated the name at 20 bytes instead of characters. In
>>> case 20 bytes were in the middle of a multi-byte
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 08:30:52AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 04:47:03PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 08/23/2017 07:47 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
We always truncated the name at 20 bytes instead of characters. In
case 20 bytes were in the middle of a
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 04:47:03PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 08/23/2017 07:47 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
We always truncated the name at 20 bytes instead of characters. In
case 20 bytes were in the middle of a multi-byte character, then the
string became invalid and various parts of the
On 08/23/2017 07:47 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> We always truncated the name at 20 bytes instead of characters. In
> case 20 bytes were in the middle of a multi-byte character, then the
> string became invalid and various parts of the code would error
> out (e.g. XML parsing of that string).
We always truncated the name at 20 bytes instead of characters. In
case 20 bytes were in the middle of a multi-byte character, then the
string became invalid and various parts of the code would error
out (e.g. XML parsing of that string). Let's instead properly
truncate it after 20 characters
