On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 15:00 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
> IMHO you should leave virHostdevReattachPCIDevice alone, and just make
> this new method call that one. In later patches you are calling this
> reattachPCIDevices() method with a single device, forcing you to put
> it into a
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 05:39:33PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-22 at 15:00 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> >
> > IMHO you should leave virHostdevReattachPCIDevice alone, and just make
> > this new method call that one. In later patches you are calling this
> >
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 04:36:03PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> This function replaces virHostdevReattachPCIDevice() and handles several
> PCI devices instead of requiring to be called once for every device.
>
> The handling of active and inactive devices is updated and made more
> explicit,
This function replaces virHostdevReattachPCIDevice() and handles several
PCI devices instead of requiring to be called once for every device.
The handling of active and inactive devices is updated and made more
explicit, which means virHostdevReAttachPCIDevices() has to be updated
as well.
---
