On 03/26/2011 07:31 AM, Matthias Bolte wrote:
> 2011/3/26 Eric Blake :
>> Detected in this valgrind run:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690734
>> ==13864== 10 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 10 of 34
>> ==13864==at 0x4A05FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
2011/3/26 Eric Blake :
> Detected in this valgrind run:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690734
> ==13864== 10 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 10 of 34
> ==13864== at 0x4A05FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
> ==13864== by 0x308587FD91: strdup (in /lib64/l
Detected in this valgrind run:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690734
==13864== 10 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 10 of 34
==13864==at 0x4A05FDE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236)
==13864==by 0x308587FD91: strdup (in /lib64/libc-2.12.so)
==13864==by 0x3B