Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 06:31:14PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
John Levon john.le...@sun.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:57:19PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
This all looks fine, but I'd prefer to retain the WARNING in the generated
file,
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 06:31:14PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
John Levon john.le...@sun.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:57:19PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
This all looks fine, but I'd prefer to retain the WARNING in the generated
file, so that people are less likely to modify it
Jim Meyering j...@meyering.net wrote:
John Levon john.le...@sun.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:57:19PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
This all looks fine, but I'd prefer to retain the WARNING in the generated
file, so that people are less likely to modify it directly. Along the
Sure,
john.le...@sun.com wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User john.le...@sun.com
# Date 1230005985 28800
# Node ID 9621540df10095ea8b0cdc83cdd3d17a68509a64
# Parent 60090fd4e447795742265241b39f2759d9530514
Split out version script into multiple files
...
diff --git a/src/Makefile.am
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:57:19PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
This all looks fine, but I'd prefer to retain the WARNING in the generated
file, so that people are less likely to modify it directly. Along the
Sure, your changes sound fine - are you going to commit your version?
thanks
john
--
John Levon john.le...@sun.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:57:19PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
This all looks fine, but I'd prefer to retain the WARNING in the generated
file, so that people are less likely to modify it directly. Along the
Sure, your changes sound fine - are you going
# HG changeset patch
# User john.le...@sun.com
# Date 1230005985 28800
# Node ID 9621540df10095ea8b0cdc83cdd3d17a68509a64
# Parent 60090fd4e447795742265241b39f2759d9530514
Split out version script into multiple files
Some (private) symbols disappear depending on build options. Introduce
