On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 10:14 +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
>
> According to our discussion sometime last week I think PPC64 driver
> should never create a CPU definition with fallback='allow' since it
> doesn't make any sense for PPC. In other words, this series is
> missing
> one patch that would m
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 11:38:09 +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> New test cases cover the cpuCompare() and cpuBaseline() implementation.
> ---
> tests/cputest.c | 10 ++
> tests/cputestdata/ppc64-baseline-incompatible-models.xml | 14 ++
New test cases cover the cpuCompare() and cpuBaseline() implementation.
---
tests/cputest.c | 10 ++
tests/cputestdata/ppc64-baseline-incompatible-models.xml | 14 ++
tests/cputestdata/ppc64-baseline-same-model-result.xml | 3 +++
tes