On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:41 AM +0100, "Daniel P. Berrange"
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:32:32AM +0100, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:20 AM +0100, "Daniel P. Berrange"
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:59:39AM
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:32:32AM +0100, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:20 AM +0100, "Daniel P. Berrange"
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:59:39AM +0100, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:36 PM +0100, "Daniel P. Berrange"
> >>
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:59:39AM +0100, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:36 PM +0100, "Daniel P. Berrange"
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:22:44PM +0100, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:33 PM +0100, Michal Privoznik
> >>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:36 PM +0100, "Daniel P. Berrange"
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:22:44PM +0100, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:33 PM +0100, Michal Privoznik
>> wrote:
>> > On 02/23/2017 10:44 AM, Marc Hartmayer
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 17:22:44 +0100, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:33 PM +0100, Michal Privoznik
> wrote:
> > On 02/23/2017 10:44 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> >> Validate the domain that actually will be started. It's semantically
> >> more clear and
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:22:44PM +0100, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:33 PM +0100, Michal Privoznik
> wrote:
> > On 02/23/2017 10:44 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> >> Validate the domain that actually will be started. It's semantically
> >> more clear and
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 03:33 PM +0100, Michal Privoznik
wrote:
> On 02/23/2017 10:44 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
>> Validate the domain that actually will be started. It's semantically
>> more clear and also it can detect failures that may have happened in
>>
On 02/23/2017 10:44 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> Validate the domain that actually will be started. It's semantically
> more clear and also it can detect failures that may have happened in
> virDomainObjSetDefTransient().
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer
>
Validate the domain that actually will be started. It's semantically
more clear and also it can detect failures that may have happened in
virDomainObjSetDefTransient().
Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer
Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk
Reviewed-by: