On 12/18/19 11:50 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
On 12/17/19 12:25 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
While we discourage people to use the old style of specifying
UEFI for their domains (the old style is putting path to the FW
image under /domain/os/loader/ whilst the new one is using
/domain/os/@firmware),
On 12/17/19 12:25 PM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> While we discourage people to use the old style of specifying
> UEFI for their domains (the old style is putting path to the FW
> image under /domain/os/loader/ whilst the new one is using
> /domain/os/@firmware), some applications might have not adop
While we discourage people to use the old style of specifying
UEFI for their domains (the old style is putting path to the FW
image under /domain/os/loader/ whilst the new one is using
/domain/os/@firmware), some applications might have not adopted
yet. They still rely on libvirt autofilling NVRAM