Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] storage: Introduce --inactive for pool-dumpxml

2012-06-25 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:43:16PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 25.06.2012 12:38, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:32:48PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > >> Storage is one of the last domains in libvirt where we don't fully > >> utilize inactive and live XML. Okay,

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] storage: Introduce --inactive for pool-dumpxml

2012-06-25 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 25.06.2012 12:38, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:32:48PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> Storage is one of the last domains in libvirt where we don't fully >> utilize inactive and live XML. Okay, it might be because we don't >> have support for that. So implement such s

[libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] storage: Introduce --inactive for pool-dumpxml

2012-06-25 Thread Michal Privoznik
Storage is one of the last domains in libvirt where we don't fully utilize inactive and live XML. Okay, it might be because we don't have support for that. So implement such support. However, we need to fallback when talking to old daemon which doesn't support this new flag. --- src/storage/storag

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] storage: Introduce --inactive for pool-dumpxml

2012-06-25 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:32:48PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > Storage is one of the last domains in libvirt where we don't fully > utilize inactive and live XML. Okay, it might be because we don't > have support for that. So implement such support. However, we need > to fallback when talking