On 02/19/2013 04:44 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/18/2013 07:38 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
>> On 02/15/2013 02:02 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
>>> Originally, only a host name was used to associate a
>>> DHCPv6 request with a specific IPv6 address. Further testing
>>> demonstrates that this is an unreli
On 02/18/2013 07:38 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 02/15/2013 02:02 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
>> Originally, only a host name was used to associate a
>> DHCPv6 request with a specific IPv6 address. Further testing
>> demonstrates that this is an unreliable method and, instead,
>> a client-id or DUID
On 02/15/2013 02:02 PM, Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> Originally, only a host name was used to associate a
> DHCPv6 request with a specific IPv6 address. Further testing
> demonstrates that this is an unreliable method and, instead,
> a client-id or DUID needs to be used. According to DHCPv6
> standar
Originally, only a host name was used to associate a
DHCPv6 request with a specific IPv6 address. Further testing
demonstrates that this is an unreliable method and, instead,
a client-id or DUID needs to be used. According to DHCPv6
standards, this id can be a duid-LLT, duid-LL, or duid-UUID
even
