Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] vz: fix event handle leak in prlsdkHandlePerfEvent

2017-02-09 Thread Maxim Nestratov
08-Feb-17 19:07, Daniel P. Berrange пишет: On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:28:34PM +0300, Maxim Nestratov wrote: When we happen to lose a domain but still get a performance event for it, we should also free the event handle. Signed-off-by: Maxim Nestratov ---

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] vz: fix event handle leak in prlsdkHandlePerfEvent

2017-02-08 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 06:28:34PM +0300, Maxim Nestratov wrote: > When we happen to lose a domain but still get a performance event > for it, we should also free the event handle. > > Signed-off-by: Maxim Nestratov > --- > src/vz/vz_sdk.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3

[libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] vz: fix event handle leak in prlsdkHandlePerfEvent

2017-02-08 Thread Maxim Nestratov
When we happen to lose a domain but still get a performance event for it, we should also free the event handle. Signed-off-by: Maxim Nestratov --- src/vz/vz_sdk.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/vz/vz_sdk.c b/src/vz/vz_sdk.c