Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/3] cpu: Drop generic driver

2016-06-25 Thread Ján Tomko
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:36:01PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: Pretending (partial) support for something we don't understand is risky. Reporting a failure is much better. Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark --- po/POTFILES.in| 1 - src/Makefile.am | 1 -

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/3] cpu: Drop generic driver

2016-06-24 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 23:50:43 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:36:01PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > > Pretending (partial) support for something we don't understand is risky. > > Reporting a failure is much better. > > I agree that pretending support is risky, but I'm

Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/3] cpu: Drop generic driver

2016-06-24 Thread Pavel Hrdina
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 07:36:01PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: > Pretending (partial) support for something we don't understand is risky. > Reporting a failure is much better. I agree that pretending support is risky, but I'm not sure about this. For example it seems that someone uses libvirt on

[libvirt] [PATCH 2/3] cpu: Drop generic driver

2016-06-24 Thread Jiri Denemark
Pretending (partial) support for something we don't understand is risky. Reporting a failure is much better. Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark --- po/POTFILES.in| 1 - src/Makefile.am | 1 - src/cpu/cpu.c | 13 ++- src/cpu/cpu_generic.c | 226