On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 06:44:55PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote:
On 09/25/2017 11:46 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
We have been trying to implement the ALLOCATE flag to mean
Is this the colloquial "we"? ;-)
We believe so.
"the volume should be fully allocated after the resize".
commit id 'aa2a4cff
On 09/25/2017 11:46 AM, Ján Tomko wrote:
> We have been trying to implement the ALLOCATE flag to mean
Is this the colloquial "we"? ;-)
> "the volume should be fully allocated after the resize".
commit id 'aa2a4cff' added support for ALLOCATE, but it seems that code
was wrong, then?
The docs a
We have been trying to implement the ALLOCATE flag to mean
"the volume should be fully allocated after the resize".
Since commit b0579ed9 we do not allocate from the existing
capacity, but from the existing allocation value.
However this value is a total of all the allocated bytes,
not an offset.
