On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:43:49AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Since its release of 2.4.0 qemu is able to enable System
> Management Module in the firmware, or disable it. We should
> expose this capability in the XML. Unfortunately, there's no good
> way to determine whether the binary we
On 08/02/16 10:58, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 01.08.2016 21:10, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 08/01/16 19:05, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
If it does, then the host kernel should be 4.4 or later. (If we want to
capture version numbers, then for each minor release, the latest patch
On 01.08.2016 21:10, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 08/01/16 19:05, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> If it does, then the host kernel should be 4.4 or later. (If we want to
>>> capture version numbers, then for each minor release, the latest patch
>>> level should be required: 4.4.16, 4.5.7, 4.6.5,
On 08/01/16 19:05, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> If it does, then the host kernel should be 4.4 or later. (If we want to
>> capture version numbers, then for each minor release, the latest patch
>> level should be required: 4.4.16, 4.5.7, 4.6.5, 4.7.0, because there
>> have been a number of
Hi,
> If it does, then the host kernel should be 4.4 or later. (If we want to
> capture version numbers, then for each minor release, the latest patch
> level should be required: 4.4.16, 4.5.7, 4.6.5, 4.7.0, because there
> have been a number of KVM tweaks and stable backports for SMM support.)
On 08/01/16 14:28, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> ... Gerd's above metadata change is dated 2016-03-21, at which point
>> both QEMU v2.4.0 and v2.5.0 had been tagged (on 2015-08-11 and on
>> 2015-12-16, respectively). I guess Gerd may have mis-remembered the
>> exact QEMU release which
Hi,
> ... Gerd's above metadata change is dated 2016-03-21, at which point
> both QEMU v2.4.0 and v2.5.0 had been tagged (on 2015-08-11 and on
> 2015-12-16, respectively). I guess Gerd may have mis-remembered the
> exact QEMU release which included SMM support?
Either that, or because some of
Hi Michal,
thanks a lot for posting this. One question:
On 07/27/16 10:43, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Since its release of 2.4.0 qemu is able to enable System
> Management Module in the firmware, or disable it. We should
> expose this capability in the XML. Unfortunately, there's no good
> way to
Since its release of 2.4.0 qemu is able to enable System
Management Module in the firmware, or disable it. We should
expose this capability in the XML. Unfortunately, there's no good
way to determine whether the binary we are talking to supports
it. I mean, if qemu's run with real machine type,
